Guest

Mar 132019
 

This is part three in a three-part blog series from The iCenter for Israel Education, sharing its approach to working closely with day schools and camps to create effective Israel education experiences for learners.

By: Dvora Goodman and Aliza Goodman

At Camp Pembroke

In our previous posts, we introduced the idea of a holistic approach to Israel education and described the process of implementing this approach in both day schools and camps. Now, we explore what day schools and camps can learn from each other and how they might sustain their success into the future.

How this Approach Plays Out in Both Settings

At first glance, the work that The iCenter does in Jewish day schools seems different from the work we do in Jewish overnight camps. And in some ways it is. The settings of schools and camps are clearly different, with differing expectations about how the students or campers will engage with the materials and experiences.

But, while the work we do is framed differently for each setting, designing meaningful Israel education, identifying learning opportunities, and assessing needs are all key elements of The iCenter’s approach, regardless of educational setting. Educators in both schools and camps understand the importance of the environment in shaping and reinforcing the learning experiences, the need for thoughtful staff training, the invaluable opportunity to build meaningful relationships with Israelis, and the powerful role arts and culture play in Israel education. Introducing educators to our holistic approach strengthens what they are doing in all of these areas and helps them achieve positive outcomes with their learners.

The Best of Both Worlds

Our work in both settings shows just how much day schools and camps can teach each other. We challenge school educators to think about the experiences they create for their learners in and out of the classroom. We challenge camp educators to be intentional about their educational programming from summer to summer and to look at the whole experience that a camper has with Israel from the time they are young through their time as staff members.

Schools Learning from Camps

Our work in iNfuse with day schools benefits from many of the resources that we developed through our work with Israel @ Camp. Recently, a school looking to strengthen its experiential programming around Israel through a series of retreats for 7th-11th grade looked to our Israel @ Camp “Israel program database” for ideas around content and method. For example, a program known as “The Amazing Autograph Race” is an active exercise that blends the red carpet experience with Israeli history and culture by challenging students to collect the autographs of as many Israeli heroes as possible. In the process, they learn about important personalities in Israel’s history and present-day. This activity was developed for camps to facilitate as an evening program and it is perfect for a school retreat.

In addition to the program database, The iCenter developed and distributed sets of Israel Resource Cards for use in camps. We found that counselors’ perceived lack of knowledge was a barrier to them running fun and educational programming with campers around Israel. The Israel Resource Cards changed that–by supplying them with basic knowledge on easily accessible cards that can be used in numerous ways, such as games and other activities. Although we developed the cards specifically with camps in mind, other educators, including those in day schools, have jumped to use them in their settings. They have been used in schools for piquing interest of the students, for reinforcing past learning, for introducing new material, and for assessing knowledge or understanding. They are also being used to engage staff in thinking about their relationships with Israel and in beginning conversations around Israel education. Thousands of sets of cards have been distributed across North America and beyond, and they continue to be a useful tool for camps, day schools, and beyond.

Camps Learning from Schools

This “Best of Both Worlds” relationship goes both ways, as camps can learn from successes in school settings as well. In our second blog post, we described The iCenter’s work around setting learning outcomes. The next step of that work in a day school setting is to ensure that the curricular and extra-curricular components related to Israel are aligned with these outcomes, and that students’ learning and connections made with Israel deepen from grade to grade. For some camps, we’ve adapted this approach, working with their leadership to develop a curricular framework using themes and goals for different units at camp. At one camp, the process of choosing outcomes led to the development of a list of Ikkarim (core principles) that now guides all their educational decisions moving forward. Then, the camp articulated broad themes for each unit that would capture the interest of campers at the different ages, deepen their learning, and help them advance their core principles. For example, one of the Ikkarim is “Ahavat Yisrael,” the desire to foster strong, personal connections between campers and Israel. Focusing on this principle, the youngest campers will deepen their relationships with Israel through an exploration of Zionism and the yearning for Israel that led to the early pioneering movement. A couple of years later, as those campers move into a different unit, “Ahavat Yisrael” is explored predominantly through Israeli arts, culture, and music; the following year, that love is fostered through embracing multiple perspectives as campers begin to ask themselves deeper questions related to their connections and understandings of Israel.

Fresh Eyes Helps Both Settings

In both settings, challenging schools and camps to examine long-standing “traditions” through the eyes of learners has proved incredibly helpful. At one camp, educators realized that the Israeli geographic locations used as names for places in camp had been around for so long that their significance was lost to campers and staff alike. Campers genuinely did not know why the lower part of camp was called “Kinneret” and why the camp hill was called “Galil.” They developed a camp-wide activity to address this, having campers research the names of places around camp and then film short videos to introduce those places to their parents on visitors day.

A discovery in a school had similar impact. As part of the iNfuse process, school educators are encouraged to walk around the school looking through the eyes of the students and noting where Israel is “seen.” Several of the schools realized that some of the long-standing “Israel images” around the school had “faded into the background” over the years; students were walking around and not noticing them. Paying attention to how the school environment supports the Israel learning led to regular rotation of what was on the walls, tuning the students in regularly to the various Israel-related posters and artifacts now hanging prominently.

Finally, many day schools and camps offer Israel experience trips to their learners. For, both, the most challenging part of planning an Israel experience is not the experience itself; rather, it is integrating the experience into the rest of the learning experiences, whether at school or at camp. We help leaders in both settings ask some difficult questions: what are we doing in the years, months, and days leading up to the experience that prepares our learners for their trips? And how do we help them – both on the trip and beyond – integrate their learning into their everyday lives? By seeking answers, the Israel experience becomes a powerful tool for reinforcing things they have already learned and lays the groundwork for future learning.

When camps and schools are eager to learn from each other and to engage in deep planning and visioning about Israel education across their settings, their learners benefit from an exceptional, holistic experience. The iCenter encourages educators in all settings to think creatively and to never miss an opportunity to engage learners in meaningful Israel education. It can happen almost anytime, anywhere.

If you are interested in learning more, please visit https://www.theicenter.org/initiative/israel-camp-intensive or contact Aliza at Aliza@theicenter.org.

Feb 262019
 

In 1997, The AVI CHAI Foundation began sponsoring day school leaders to attend one of two week-long summer institutes at The Principals Center, a division of the Harvard Graduate School of Education.  Many of the 566 participants who have attended since then found the institute to be among the most transformative professional development experiences of their careers.

Beginning in 2013, the Foundation built upon the Harvard experience with a specific focus on helping leaders enhance their schools’ Jewish mission.  This involved adding several components to the program, including evening sessions at Harvard, coaching, check-ins throughout the following year, and networking with one’s cohort.  As part of the application process that begins today, we are featuring various alumni who will share their own stories and how this program helped them achieve their goals.  Hopefully, this will give those considering applying a taste of what’s possible within the context of this incredibly catalytic program. Applications for Harvard Summer 2019 are now open, deadline March 15! See here for more details.

This week, we hear from Rabbi Yehuda Fogel, Associate Principal for Limmudei Kodesh, Hebrew Academy of Long Beach, New York.

Rabbi Yehuda Fogel
AOL 2015
Associate Principal for Limmudei Kodesh, Hebrew Academy of Long Beach, New York

When I started teaching middle school limudei kodesh (Judaics) in 2006, I thought I had faced my greatest challenge – classes full of pre-teen and young teen boys learning Chumash and Gemara.  Fortunately, I was among several helpful colleagues who were master teachers, and I learned so much from them, to the benefit of my students.  But my leap into administration in 2013 broadened my view, and I realized that as positive as our students’ experience was each year, the three-year division experience was not truly integrated or coordinated.  My goal was to develop a comprehensive Judaics curriculum for our middle school, and so in 2015 I excitedly went to Harvard to help me achieve that goal.

It goes without saying that the Harvard presentations were incredible, the learning groups stimulating, and the AVI CHAI cohort unparalleled.  Within a day, I was convinced that something great would come from this, but I could not have anticipated how it came about.  While I went to Cambridge presumably to learn about curriculum development, to my surprise my plan emerged from two totally other presentations – one on professional learning communities (PLCs) and the other on the use of data – that educators from Texas and New Jersey in my Harvard group shared with me and how they used them to coordinate curriculum at their schools. With Jonathan Cannon’s help, I went back to my school determined to do something big.

And big it was.  Returning to HALB, I shared the ideas with our most veteran and experienced Judaic Rabbis and we developed a step-by-step plan for implementation. We started organizing PLCs by electing veteran Rabbis to lead each grade’s team, adding to their visibility and prestige. Then, we worked on shifting our instruction towards a data-driven model.  This novelty required daily collaborative meetings in which I participated.  Initially, I set the schedules and agendas of the meetings, guiding the coordination of skills and concepts across grades and tracks, but over time, the faculty began to take on more and more responsibility.  Discussion of curriculum led to the Rabbis to develop and assign standards, which in turn led naturally to analysis of their pedagogy.  Now our teachers seek out and share teaching techniques, materials and methodologies that help students achieve the specific goals laid out in the curriculum’s clear and detailed standards. Lastly, the synergies within the PLCs are a delight to observe, as more experienced teachers share their teaching with their newer colleagues, and younger teachers introduce 21st century technologies to more veteran teachers.

The focus on data organically led to changes in grading. Instead of overall grades in a subject, students are graded on each skill or concept.  We worked closely with an educational software company to develop a standards-based gradebook appropriate for our students, in which students can see almost nightly how they are doing and where they might need help on specific skills and plans for them so they can develop those skills. Students (and their parents) are grateful for knowing where to focus their energies, and teachers are thrilled to be able to offer individual students either additional support or modified curriculum or assignments based on their individualized strengths and challenges – not to mention having a tool to more accurately analyze their own teaching.  Without a doubt, the vehicle of regular, collegial and collaborative PLCs created an environment that enabled the turn to data to be so effective at our school.  Any other top-down approach I know would have taken many years more.

This transformation, nearly complete after three full years, is groundbreaking for our school.  Whereas Judaics faculty used to meet rarely, now they all – veteran and novice teachers alike –eagerly look forward each week to working within their PLCs to study the data and advance student learning.   At the same time, all students – regardless of skillset or training – now enjoy the limmudei kodesh learning much more because they know where they are succeeding and they know where to put the emphasis for growth.  It’s a win-win for everyone- and all from conversations I had with teachers from Texas and New Jersey one day at Harvard.

AOL 2015 Jewish Day School Cohort

The author’s Harvard cohort

Feb 142019
 

Rabbi David Saltzman, Principal and Tefilah teacher at Maimonides School in Brookline, MA, is a participant in Jblend Boston, a partnership between AVI CHAI and the Combined Jewish Philanthropies (CJP). The program works with 8 Jewish day schools in Greater Boston as a regional cohort to advance personalized learning in their schools individually and collectively. Learn about how Rabbi Saltzman has worked toward his goal of using his Tefillah class as an incubator for self-paced experimentation, and what he has learned along the way.

Cross-posted from the BetterLesson Blog

By: Romain Bertrand, BetterLesson Senior Manager of Innovative Learning Experiences

As a former teacher and now as an instructional coach and the Senior Manager of Innovative Learning Experiences at BetterLesson, I continue to be fascinated by the idea of figuring out ways to give students more control over the pace of their instruction, while continuing to create the conditions for a meaningful collective learning experience.

This year, I have the privilege of working with Rabbi David Saltzman who is the Principal and Tefillah teacher at Maimonides Elementary School in Brookline, MA. David has been a teacher and an administrator for more than 20 years. You can read more about David here. He and I share the same passion for Self-Paced Learning —  the idea of giving (almost) complete control of the pace of a learning progression to students, while supporting them to leverage their mistakes as learning opportunities via 1:1 or small group teaching. When David and I began our work together this year, we set a goal to use his Tefillah class as an incubator for self-paced experimentation. Halfway through the year, we reflected on what he has learned so far and what he can share with other educators interested in a similar quest. Our reflection is shared below.

Q&A

Romain Bertrand (RB): How would you summarize what you have been experimenting with in your classroom this year?

David Saltzman: I decided to transfer the content and assessments of my 5th grade Tefillah class (“prayer” in Hebrew) completely online. Students can access and learn the material in my Google Site, sharpen their reading skills and self-assess their progress at their own pace.

RB: What led you to want to do this?

DS: I am a firm believer in student-directed learning. The teacher should facilitate and guide student exploration and experience, but ultimately, students should have the ability to learn at their own pace, create their own products that demonstrate understanding, and decide how they want to work and with whom. Students should also be able to determine how well they think they know the content or have mastered a skill. Lifelong learning includes self-assessing and being able to determine when it’s time to start a new topic or challenge. When students feel in control of their learning in these areas, they will be more engaged, motivated and willing to learn and work.

I had taught a Tefilla class to 5th graders for seven years and I found that I was not reaching all students. Some students were mastering the content quickly while others were taking longer and not everyone was engaged at all times during direct instruction. Because of these hindrances, not everyone was able to deepen their understanding about Tefilla, develop their thinking skills in order to better appreciate prayer, or participate in class discussion. I was determined to create a Tefilla class where students would be engaged, be able to work collaboratively, and be excited to come to class. I also decided that I wanted a class where everyone would demonstrate mastery. In order to accomplish these goals, I moved the class to a self-paced structure, leveraging my Google Site.

RB: What impact has this shift had on your students?

DS: Students now look forward to class and they are excited about learning Tefilla. They are engaged almost 100% of the time and I am collecting much more data about what the students are learning and thinking. I believe this has helped further their knowledge about Tefillah and their appreciation of the prayer experience in a more profound way. They also learn how to use the Google suite of tools by using docs, forms, slides, and draw in order to answer questions and demonstrate and share their learning through electronic products.

Students also self-assess their own progress and knowledge. It gives them ownership of the learning and lets them feel that they are in control of their own pace class.

Here is what it looks like in my classroom on any given day:

Video of Students in Action:

I was also curious to hear from my students so I asked a colleague to interview a couple of them and gather their feedback.

Here is what they had to say:

RB: What strategies and resources would you like to share with other educators interested in a similar journey?

DS: The main platforms for me are Google sites and Google classroom. My students watch videos through Prezi, Googleslides, Animoto, Pow-Toon and other sites. They are assessed through Google forms, Quizlet and other online programs. The students work at their own pace on the Google sites and find the material mostly in Google classroom.

I also use Google forms, docs, slides, and draw for students to demonstrate their learning.

I used BetterLesson’s Progress and Mastery Tracking strategy to develop this student tracker. My students use it to track their progress, self-assess and record their actual assessment data. It is important to me that they do both: self-assess and demonstrate mastery.

Finally I have created and started testing with my students this “You Can Teach Tefillah!” google doc. It is inspired by BetterLesson’s Mastery Map and Standards Based Peer Tutors strategy and its ultimate purpose is to encourage my students to volunteer their teaching or mentoring to support others once they have self-assessed at a level 4 (Ready to teach this concept to someone else).

RB: What are some changes you anticipate trying to make moving forward to improve upon your system?

DS: I would like to work with small groups more in order to discuss concepts at a deeper level with some and unscramble confusions with others. At the beginning of the process, I had to spend more time supporting them one-on-one to become comfortable with the different tech tools and a different form of learning. The idea behind the “You Can Teach Tefillah!” google doc is to support my students in learning from each other more while I meet small groups. It is still taking time to hold at this point and I am curious to see where it goes.

RB: As a principal, what advice would you give teachers and leaders who would be interested in growing self-paced practices in their classrooms?

DS: I think for leaders the key resides in your willingness to create a culture of experimentation and innovation in your building. Ask yourself: “What could I do to make my teachers feel comfortable and safe to try innovative practices?”. We are working on fostering this culture right now at Maimonides Elementary School and we are starting to see the benefit of this shift. For example, a colleague has asked me to support him this Spring in building and testing a prototype of a similar system for his classroom.

For teachers, if the shift to a complete self-paced curriculum feels scary, do not hesitate to start small and test the idea on one lesson or one unit, maybe toward the end of the school year, so that you have time to reflect afterwards and determine if you would like to scale your idea up in 2019-2020. Start small, and gradually expand and improve.

Feb 122019
 

In 1997, The AVI CHAI Foundation began sponsoring day school leaders to attend one of two week-long summer institutes at The Principals Center, a division of the Harvard Graduate School of Education.  Many of the 566 participants who have attended since then found the institute to be among the most transformative professional development experiences of their careers.

Beginning in 2013, the Foundation built upon the Harvard experience with a specific focus on helping leaders enhance their schools’ Jewish mission.  This involved adding several components to the program, including evening sessions at Harvard, coaching, check-ins throughout the following year, and networking with one’s cohort.  As part of the application process that begins today, we are featuring various alumni who will share their own stories and how this program helped them achieve their goals.  Hopefully, this will give those considering applying a taste of what’s possible within the context of this incredibly catalytic program. Applications for Harvard Summer 2019 are now open, deadline March 15! See here for more details.

This week, we hear from Lisa Schopf, Middle School Director, Milton Gottesman Jewish Day School of the Nation’s Capital, Washington, D.C.

Lisa Schopf
Middle School Director, Milton Gottesman Jewish Day School of the Nation’s Capital, Washington, D.C.
AOL 2016
The Secret to Making Professional Development Stick

How often has this happened to you?  You attend an amazing professional development experience, and get all inspired to apply the new ideas and practical advice in your own school.  You get back, climb on to the fast-paced treadmill of school, and those great new approaches remain in your mind or in your notes.  No serious change follows, and those great new programs you had wanted to start never take root.  A few months later, we remember our initial passion and regret the lack of follow-through.  If only we had had just a little more time or more support to make those best intentions the new reality.

AVI CHAI’s Harvard program for day school leaders gets that.  It helped transform and elevate my participation at the Harvard School of Education’s Art of Leadership (AOL) program, so that the seven days of learning and inspiration in Cambridge had an enduring impact on its participants well past that one week at the end of June. Being part of a day school cohort that met regularly, and then having the benefit of a year-long structure with access to solid, experienced mentors, made all the difference.

I took part in AOL in the summer of 2016.  I was in the midst of creating a new middle school at our school, Milton Gottesman Jewish Day School of the Nation’s Capital, and was very eager to learn from the experience and insights of others.  Certainly, Harvard offered a rich program of diverse classes and seminars. Each session provided practical lessons and inspirational messages, encouraging us to formulate a clearer understanding of our leadership style and to develop important skills.

However, what really helped this week stand apart from other professional development opportunities was that it had a built-in system for making sure that the learning and the inspiration would endure. First, the day school cohort members met each night to reflect on the learning, discuss how they could “bring it home” to their own schools, and share ideas. I learned so much from the experiences and insights of other day school administrators in my cohort.  Second, we each came into the program with an idea for a specific innovative program or approach that we wanted to develop further. I had a plan in mind for a weekly Scholars Forum in which our students would engage in a study of a contemporary issue, enriching their learning through working with experts in a variety of fields and by delving into Jewish texts to connect our sacred texts with contemporary contexts.  Meeting with Jonathan Cannon, our day school cohort’s facilitator, over the course of the week helped me further concretize the plan as he encouraged me to explore logistical issues in schools and contemplate big picture considerations.

We left the week-long program with a commitment to pursue the initiative we designed and with a structure to ensure it happened in focused and realistic ways.  We were encouraged to calendar the programs we planned and to produce write-ups of our programs, in what turned out to be an iterative process.  Acknowledging that our initial plans would likely need refinement from the early blueprints we had, Jonathan Cannon and his colleague Alana Kotler met with us regularly by phone to support the implementation of our plans. This is essential. Having this ongoing support and multiple opportunities to express my plans in writing and in consultations with them helped me clarify my thinking and adjust the plans for Scholars Forum.

The results have been amazing.  Our program has a clear structure, even as each year we take on a new subject of study. The four constants are:

  • engaging with a contemporary issue of relevance to our students;
  • delving deep into related Jewish texts which deepen our understanding of the subject;
  • involving experts to extend our learning and join with us in our studies;
  • and working on a student- directed and student-created project that helps us connect and contribute to others.

These elements have become the hallmarks of our program. Last year, the 6th grade students – our inaugural middle schoolers – created a documentary, complete with archival photos and footage, and interviews of past staff and alumni, for our school’s thirtieth anniversary.  It was so well done, we rented out a local theater and premiered it for the entire community!   This year, the students are creating a scavenger hunt of civil rights in DC to share with schools visiting the DC area for a middle school or high school trip.

All this came from a vague idea I had going to Harvard three years ago.  Through this remarkable program for day school leaders, that idea was transformed into concrete action that established a template that I expect to endure for years to come.  I encourage you to seek out and make the most of this exemplary summer program. And when you’re done, please write me at Lisa.Schopf@miltongottesman.org about what you learned and what you will bring back to your own schools – I’m always eager to learn!

Sixth graders at Milton Gottesman Jewish Day School.

Feb 062019
 

This is part two in a three-part blog series from The iCenter for Israel Education, sharing its approach to working closely with day schools and camps to create effective Israel education experiences for learners.

By Dvora Goodman and Aliza Goodman

Photo courtesy of The iCenter

In our last post, we introduced a holistic approach to Israel education and described part of the process of implementing this type of approach in day schools and camps. In both of these settings, this approach requires teamwork–between Israelis and North Americans, between school/camp leadership and educators/counselors, and among educators/counselors themselves–each bringing to the team their unique relationships with Israel, and an understanding that nearly any experience can be an opportunity for Israel education. In this post, we dive deeper into the process of setting goals and share examples of learning outcomes, demonstrating how both goals and desired outcomes guide schools and camps in making programmatic decisions.

Everyone Should Ask “Why?”

Although most schools and camps are actively engaged in Israel education to varying degrees, the educational leadership in these settings rarely takes the time to articulate why they are doing it. Yet, this why is crucial because it keeps leadership teams driven and focused on their educational priorities. It serves as a “north star” for making educational choices, ensuring strong and integrated learning experiences. This why serves as the basis for the development of a vision–an aspirational statement, a specific articulation that will guide educational decisions about Israel, create shared language among educators, and be readily translated into learning outcomes. Going through a process of visioning challenges the leadership and educators to address key questions such as: What do we mean by the term “Israel?” What is the significance of Israel in the context of the school or camp’s larger vision? What is the significance of Israel to Jewish life in general? All of these questions clearly connect back to the big question of why? 

Connected to a vision are learning outcomes. These are understood in this context as general overarching statements articulating the important ideas that we want our learners to grasp over time. They are meant to be expressions of the vision in measurable and observable ways. For example, a vision might include the following sentiment: “[Our graduates] will be conversant in the history, politics and culture of the modern state of Israel and understand its complexities. They will know that life in Israel is not homogeneous or single minded – that it is a beautifully woven tapestry with the colors and textures of many kinds of people from different backgrounds.” One learning outcome connected to this might be, “Learners will encounter and experience modern Israel as a complex and evolving nation with multiple narratives.”

How are We Going to Get There? Alignment of all Areas of Israel Education

Articulating a vision and selecting a few targeted learning outcomes helps a school and a camp make decisions – both in the short term and in the future – about what the educational experience will consist of and how success is measured moving forward. A vision and learning outcomes also help ensure that all aspects of the educational experience are aligned and work together to propel them toward shared goals. As part of our process, we work closely with schools and camps to identify areas where Israel can be brought in anew, and to make sure that the areas where Israel already exists are aligned with the vision for why Israel is important for the learner’s experience in the first place. This is the “real work” of strengthening and infusing Israel throughout an educational program.

For example, a school we worked with identified one of its overarching learning outcomes as, “Students will have the tools to engage in productive dialogue about Israel, considering multiple perspectives.” When the educational team went back and looked at what they were teaching year to year, they realized that there was no way they would be able to achieve this outcome without making changes. This was because the Israel that was being presented – until that time – reflected only one perspective. Committed to this aspect of their vision, the team is now engaged in a close examination of the materials being used in the classroom and beyond at all grade levels to ensure that they are, in fact, representing multiple perspectives and encouraging students to explore them.

As another example, a camp we work with identified one of its learning outcomes as, “By engaging in current, relevant learning about Israel, campers and staff will understand that Israel is complex and evolving, and that their own life long relationship with Israel may also be complex and evolving.” Through this articulation, they realized that previously the Israel that was being explored by staff and campers was the same each summer and did not challenge them to deepen and evolve their relationships with Israel. This has led them to develop a curricular framework that includes broad themes for exploration at different age groups in camp, each one inviting staff and campers to re-examine their relationships with Israel in new ways. As they go through this program each summer, they will learn more and continue to understand Israel’s multifaceted nature.

Stay tuned for part 3 of this series in which we explore what day schools and camps can learn from each other and how they might sustain their success into the future.

If you are interested in learning more, please visit https://www.theicenter.org/initiative/israel-camp-intensive or contact Aliza at Aliza@theicenter.org.

Feb 052019
 

In 1997, The AVI CHAI Foundation began sponsoring day school leaders to attend one of two week-long summer institutes at The Principals Center, a division of the Harvard Graduate School of Education.  Many of the 566 participants who have attended since then found the institute to be among the most transformative professional development experiences of their careers.

Beginning in 2013, the Foundation built upon the Harvard experience with a specific focus on helping leaders enhance their schools’ Jewish mission.  This involved adding several components to the program, including evening sessions at Harvard, coaching, check-ins throughout the following year, and networking with one’s cohort.  As part of the application process that begins today, we are featuring various alumni who will share their own stories and how this program helped them achieve their goals.  Hopefully, this will give those considering applying a taste of what’s possible within the context of this incredibly catalytic program. Applications for Harvard Summer 2019 are now open! See here for more details.

This week, we hear from Dr. Bryn Harari, Principal, Hebrew Academy of Orange County, CA.

Dr. Bryn Harari
Principal, Hebrew Academy of Orange County, CA
LEV 2017
“I Went in With One Project and Came out With Two” – My Harvard LEV Experience

When the announcement came from AVI CHAI offering to sponsor day school leaders at Harvard, I was both excited and conflicted.  To a committed life-long learner and veteran administrator such as myself, the program description sounded so compelling – outstanding faculty presenting on the most current topics that every administrator grapples with.  In my second year as the principal at the Hebrew Academy of Orange County in California, I was eager to advance the learning at my school, and I was confident spending a week in Cambridge with the camaraderie of other day school leaders would help.  On the other hand, it meant giving up a full week in the middle of precious family vacation time, and I wasn’t sure the benefits would be worth the cost, especially since I already had 20+ years of administrative experience.

It was my project that pushed me to apply.  I wanted to implement a new writing program integrating Judaics and General Studies around the weekly Parsha (Torah portion), but I was looking for ways to do so that would garner support and commitment across the entire faculty, even though I was only at the school a short time.  Since the program invited participants to choose a specific project to focus on, I felt this would be an ideal opportunity to both envision and plan this new program, in the company of like-minded educational and day school professional.

Coming to Harvard was one of the best decisions of my career.  Sitting in the lecture halls and break-out groups was nothing short of electrifying.  (I wouldn’t normally admit anything as nerdy as this, but I trust that if you’ve read this far, that you just might relate.)  I couldn’t write fast enough to keep up with my thoughts and ideas – not just the notes and quotes from the lectures, but all of the connections and ideas that came to my mind from the discussion. So many topics were directly relevant to my school and community that I actually began implementation right then and there:  with multiple tabs open on my laptop, I made notes in my student, parent and faculty handbooks, and on the school calendar. I began planning future parent engagement activities and creating agendas to share what I was learning with other administrators and teachers. The discussions with fellow educators, both from around the world and from other day schools, was similarly stimulating and nurturing, inspiring me with confidence that I could in fact make my project a reality.  If I may say it, it was an educational leader’s “embarrassment of riches.”

Upon returning, I spoke to everyone who would listen about what I learned and what inspired me.  I devised a plan to implement the writing program I had dreamed of – a collaborative project between Judaic and General Studies teachers that spans multiple grade levels and draws on the students’ and teachers’ passion for Parsha learning and on GS teachers’ skills and commitment for a strong writing program.  We are now in Year 2 of the Parsha Project, and our teachers’ modifications of its implementation to make it more enduring and effective. Many of them, though not all (let’s keep it real), have embraced it and I foresee it becoming a defining aspect of our unique curriculum, bridging the Judaic and General Studies in a way that highlights the strengths and features of each.

While I went to Harvard with my project in mind, I was obviously introduced to many new ideas throughout the week.  One was “Universal Design for Learning” (UDL), and when I learned about it, it immediately struck a deep chord within me.  While I have promoted individualized and inclusive education for many years, this approach articulated the rationale and strategies in a way that shifted my understanding and perception of it.  I was literally blown away by its potential to shift our school’s entire approach to special education, and I was determined to make that happen.

Having gained tremendous insight into the challenges we experienced meeting the needs of students with learning differences, I felt driven to overhaul our special needs program.  For the first time, our school hired a full-time inclusion specialist last Fall who was skilled in UDL.  We began introducing concepts of UDL at every staff development meeting.  Our teachers now have the opportunity to participate in individual and group consultations every week.  Our Push-in/Pull-out program has shifted in its goals and the way it looks.  We are doing more teacher collaboration than ever before, expanding the capacity of our teachers to support students with different learning styles and needs. Our language about issues relating to special needs has changed, and with it, our shared understanding of what it means to create an inclusive environment.  Slowly we are transforming the landscape of our inclusive classrooms.

So, while I may have entered the program with one idea – to create the Parsha Project – I came back with two.  For that alone I would have said “dayenu” – “it is enough.”  But it wasn’t just the impressive content of the sessions, and the instructors’ passion for their material, that inspired me.  The curriculum, instruction, and the learning environment were all deeply personalized, modeling what they wanted us to take home: to be aware of who our learners are, to acknowledge that each of them brings rich and valuable background experiences to the learning, and to have confidence in their intentions and abilities.  This unique combination created a stimulating, enduring and even visceral learning experience, one which I have tried to recreate for teachers, staff, and other administrators in my school.  Without doubt, this will also transform the students’ learning.

Eighteen months later, not only do I still refer to my planning notes and the goals I set at Harvard, but I still feel that special experience often enough to be reminded of its power, which fuels me to strive for more.  I can honestly say participating in the Harvard LEV program changed the way we do many things at our school: the writing curriculum, student services, family education and engagement, and professional development.  Above all, participating in this very special program changed my leadership.  And that is the greatest gift of all.

To apply to attend Harvard Summer 2019, please see here for more details.

LEV 2017 group photo

Jan 292019
 

In 1997, The AVI CHAI Foundation began sponsoring day school leaders to attend one of two week-long summer institutes at The Principals Center, a division of the Harvard Graduate School of Education.  Many of the 566 participants who have attended since then found the institute to be among the most transformative professional development experiences of their careers.

Beginning in 2013, the Foundation built upon the Harvard experience with a specific focus on helping leaders enhance their schools’ Jewish mission.  This involved adding several components to the program, including evening sessions at Harvard, coaching, check-ins throughout the following year, and networking with one’s cohort.  In advance of the application process that begins in early February, we will feature various alumni who will share their own stories and how this program helped them achieve their goals.  Hopefully, this will give those considering applying a taste of what’s possible within the context of this incredibly catalytic program.

This week, we hear from Ilanit Hoory, Lower School Principal, and Yael Buechler, Lower School Rabbi in Residence, both at Solomon Schechter School of Westchester.

Ilanit Hoory (AOL 2015 and LEV 2017) and Yael Buechler (AOL 2017)
Solomon Schechter School of Westchester
Leadership through a STEAM Mindset

Even though the olive oil we made for Chanukah – spun in a centrifuge in our MakerSpace – still remains in test tubes on our office shelves, we at Schechter Westchester’s Lower School are already talking about Passover! Our fifth grade Judaic Studies teachers and engineering teacher are meeting to prepare for a Rube Goldberg machine Passover project, while at the same time a second grade Judaic Studies teacher is debriefing with our technology integrator, after transforming Ozobots into “Avrambots” that journeyed all the way from Ur Kasdim to Canaan. These are just some of the exciting collaborative projects that regularly integrate Judaic Studies and STEAM at our school.

This “maker mindset” (read about it here) has not always been a given at our Lower School. While we did have one of the first state-of-the-art MakerSpaces in a Lower School setting, for many it was just one room in the building.  We set out to transform our entire school culture into a “maker culture.”  How could constructivist learning, part of the maker culture DNA, seep into more areas of our Lower School, especially within Judaics? That is what we proposed to do for our Harvard project, and we were hoping to learn the right leadership tools and strategies to manage this change in our school’s culture.

We write this post together as a Lower School Principal and Lower School Rabbi, who were fortunate enough to be a part of the summer 2017 AVI CHAI-cohorts of LEV and AOL, respectively. We witnessed the success of the “maker” model in other content areas of the school, and wanted to expand this model particularly to Judaic Studies. Ilanit, the Lower School Principal, had attended AOL in 2015 and that experience, together with the support of her day school cohort, helped her cultivate a culture of teachers as learners among the Hebrew and Judaic faculty.  Seeking to develop a team of leaders at the Lower School with unique perspectives to help manage this change, Ilanit encouraged Yael, the Lower School’s rabbi to apply to AOL, so that we could together extend the maker model more extensively into the realm of Judaic Studies.

Upon returning from Cambridge, we built upon the process of using our experiences at Harvard to help the Lower School culture more broadly embrace the maker mindset beyond the MakerSpace itself. Ilanit was inspired by her learning during LEV to take the MakerSpace and let its “warmth” seep into all areas of the school. Ilanit describes the MakerSpace as a “Shemesh Shemechamemet” “a sun that warms” the entire school. At LEV, Ilanit was particularly inspired by a tool she learned from Professor Jal Mehta to make learning deeper for all students. Ilanit wanted to build upon this tool to design the maker style of learning so it could be accessible to all types of learners. After AOL, Yael reflected on learning with Professor Monica Higgins, who explored how to lead through learning using a case study of what occurred at Mt. Everest. Yael utilized this case study to think about the different team members and constituencies involved in the process of expanding this maker culture to the realm of Judaic Studies at the Lower School. As Ilanit and Yael set out to create a change in culture, they identified and collaborated with different leaders at the Lower School who could help implement this change.

We believed that by giving our Judaic Studies teachers opportunities to collaborate as a team and to work with our technology integrator or engineering teacher on different units, this would lead to greater opportunities for constructivist learning for our students. This process of a maker mindset shift has taken several years, by building the trust among a great team of Judaic Studies faculty and by creating opportunities for collaboration with our curriculum coordinators and STEAM specialist.

Not only do we currently have new STEAM/Judaic Studies projects in place for each grade, but Judaic Studies teachers now take the initiative and collaborate with our STEAM specialists on their own! This Maker mindset has also enriched our professional development: for instance, this past summer our leadership team and grade team leaders began their year by building Migdal Bavel (Tower of Babel) in our MakerSpace. They were each given roles and restrictions for how to communicate with one another to mirror the communication challenges that occurred in the story in Bereshit. Our faculty then reflected on this process both as learners and educators. It was incredible to hear their reflections and see them initiate ideas for how this type of activity could be introduced to their students.

We appreciate the learning opportunities at Harvard and from our AVI CHAI cohorts to be able to manage the change we continue to envision at the Lower School. We view this change as part of our school’s overarching shift in emphasis toward a more integrated, constructivist learning. We invite you to come visit us the next time you are in New York!

Jan 222019
 

In 1997, The AVI CHAI Foundation began sponsoring day school leaders to attend one of two week-long summer institutes at The Principals Center, a division of the Harvard Graduate School of Education.  Many of the 566 participants who have attended since then found the institute to be among the most transformative professional development experiences of their careers.

Beginning in 2013, the Foundation built upon the Harvard experience with a specific focus on helping leaders enhance their schools’ Jewish mission.  This involved adding several components to the program, including evening sessions at Harvard, coaching, check-ins throughout the following year, and networking with one’s cohort.  In advance of the application process that begins in early February, we will feature various alumni who will share their own stories and how this program helped them achieve their goals.  Hopefully, this will give those considering applying a taste of what’s possible within the context of this incredibly catalytic program.

This week, we hear from Dr. Sarah Levy, Director of Jewish Life and Learning at Denver Jewish Day School.

Dr. Sarah Levy
Director of Jewish Life and Learning
Denver Jewish Day School
AOL 2017

When the announcement of the Harvard program for Jewish day school leaders arrived in my inbox, I was immediately intrigued.  The application asked us to share what projects we were working on to enhance the Jewish mission of our school.  For me, that was easy; as director of Jewish Life and Learning at Denver Jewish Day School, a K-12 community day school, I was working on several such projects, but my work on tefilah (prayer) stood out as something with which I could use some support, guidance, and, frankly, some inspiration to ensure it went well.

Improving tefilah was high on our K-12 school’s agenda. We wanted to develop a tefilah program that is engaging and relevant to our 21st century students; one that teaches skills, fosters emotional dispositions, but also provides space for students to make their own meaning.  The truth was, I had already done a lot of advance work for a new plan for tefilah at our school, having conducted a listening tour, read the relevant research, and reached out to different schools about their programs. I had more data than I needed, and I just needed to take that next step and form everything I’d learned into something that would help Denver JDS shed the negative connotations of “tefilah” and make it an important part of our program. Harvard’s “Art of Leadership” (AOL), together with the day school framework, seemed like a great place to do that; I just wasn’t sure exactly how that week would help.  I knew my day school colleagues would understand my project, but what would Harvard professors or public school leaders, most of whom had no idea what tefilah was, be able to contribute to my plans for improving prayer at Denver JDS?

To my surprise, the answer turned out to be: “quite a bit.”  Dramatic and significant change at schools always demands a lot of faculty, students, and parents, and I had to learn how to be the leader who can effectively shepherd people through this process.  For example, in one of the first sessions we explored “adaptive” versus “technical” challenges and considered various leadership styles and when to use them.  Without doubt, my tefilah project was an adaptive challenge that would require specific leadership styles. In another high-impact session, we looked at getting to the root of why systems are reluctant to change, naming our big assumptions that lead us to struggle with change. I came to understand how many of my faculty, students, and parents had major assumptions regarding tefilah and why many struggled with change. Other sessions such as exploring cognitive biases and making better use of data were, not surprisingly, highly relevant to my tefilah project, and to other Judaic initiatives I was contemplating. Lastly, those school leaders from around the world with no knowledge of tefilah, nevertheless, all had experience working with students of different ages and diverse faculty to introduce new programs in various subjects, and their insights helped me reflect constructively on my own situation.

As anticipated, the ‘day school overlay’ was a tremendous benefit.  Each night we would gather to process the day and consider how to apply what we’d learned to our own day school settings, making our learning less overwhelming and a whole lot more applicable.  The facilitation and personalized mentoring by Jonathan Cannon and Alanna Kotler, coupled with the support and encouragement of my cohort’s very active WhatsApp chat group, really helped me get broad buy-in and successfully implement my tefilah project – a “Zman Kodesh” program for our Upper Division. (Feel free to contact me about it!)

While I went in to the program with a specific and focused goal, I am amazed how much I learned sitting at Harvard during the day with 150 school leaders from around the world, and with 17 day school colleagues each evening.  In fact, everything I do now at Denver JDS – improving our Hebrew program, building our Judaic studies scope and sequence, or just helping my Jewish day school be the best it could be – I relate back to what I learned at my Harvard sessions, from my group members, and from my day school colleagues – with whom I am thrilled to be in almost daily contact, a full 18 months later!  If I am able to have a lasting impact on my school, I owe a great deal of that to what I learned at my week in Cambridge.

Jan 152019
 

In 1997, The AVI CHAI Foundation began sponsoring day school leaders to attend one of two week-long summer institutes at The Principals Center, a division of the Harvard Graduate School of Education.  Many of the 566 participants who have attended since then found the institute to be among the most transformative professional development experiences of their careers.

Beginning in 2013, the Foundation built upon the Harvard experience with a specific focus on helping leaders enhance their schools’ Jewish mission.  This involved adding several components to the program, including evening sessions at Harvard, coaching, check-ins throughout the following year, and networking with one’s cohort.  In advance of the application process that begins in early February, we will feature various alumni who will share their own stories and how this program helped them achieve their goals.  Hopefully, this will give those considering applying a taste of what’s possible within the context of this incredibly catalytic program.

This week, we hear from Yehuda Jeiger, Associate Principal at Bi-Cultural Hebrew Academy (formerly Bi-Cultural Day School) in Stamford, CT.

Yehuda Jeiger
Associate Principal, Judaic Studies
Bi-Cultural Hebrew Academy
AOL 2017

To be honest, when I started out as a middle school Judaics teacher, I dismissed Robert Fulgham’s 1990 poem “All I Really Need to Know, I Learned in Kindergarten.”  Clearly he missed all the wonderful and important things we teach 12-14 year olds, especially in Jewish day schools, when our middle schoolers are introduced to more sophisticated, engaging and adult ways of understanding their Judaism.  We analyze Tanach, start Torah she-be’al peh, and learn the details of Jewish history.  Kindergartners certainly don’t learn that!

But then my own children passed through kindergarten, and I became Associate Principal for Judaics of a pre K-8th day school.  Through those two experiences, I learned much more about Early Childhood education, and I started to identify and appreciate the “magic” of that phase of school.  To me, kindergarten teachers were masters of cross-curricular integrated learning, where, for instance, learning about Noah and the flood also meant learning about weather and rainbows, math and calendars.  Unlike our departmentalized approach in middle school, kindergartners enjoyed learning in a way that combined so many different perspectives, so many diverse aspects of life in a single unit!  I aspired to do something similar in our middle school, and figuring out how to do that was the project I took with me in 2017 to “Art and Craft of Leadership” (AOL), the Harvard summer program for educational leaders in their first 5 years.

Harvard group, AOL 2017

My primary goal was to develop a clear roadmap for this work.  Harvard’s incredible speakers on strategy and culture change gave me many concrete ideas, but they also helped me understand much more about myself as a leader.  I came to understand about varied leadership styles, and how it’s okay to use different styles – collaborative, authoritarian, etc. – as the occasion demands (to this day, I keep a laminated page on my desk as a constant reminder of this expanded leadership toolkit).  However, it was the evening sessions with my day school colleagues, led by Jonathan Cannon and Alanna Kotler of Educannon Consulting, which made all the difference. In my personal conversations with these leaders, I learned so much how to turn my dream into a reality: from designing initial small steps with one or two units, introducing it to faculty to secure their buy-in, and insuring early successes.

Let me share some examples.  All change starts with oneself, so I piloted a Science and Torah unit myself as part of our 7th Grade Jewish Studies curriculum, which went very well.  We built on that success by expanding first to History and Navi (Prophets) and then to other areas of Science and Torah.  I invited other teachers to do the same, and worked with them to come up with ideas.  Within the first year, we were able to have each Middle School teacher find at least one unit a year that involved cross curricular integration.  The most ambitious topic we tackled was with our 8th grade, discussing the Torah’s and science’s views of the origins of the universe and of life on earth.  We helped students identify and differentiate the goals of science and Torah, and they studied great Jewish thinkers, from Maimonides to Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch, who worked to make these two realms consistent.  We wanted to show them that science could support the Torah and enhance our understanding of God and the world in which we live. As one student remarked to me, “I used to think it was science or Torah. Now I see it can be both.”  Or as another student put it, “I learned how lucky we are to get to learn both sides of the story.” If that’s not the goal of our integrated curriculum, I don’t know what is!

As I look back over what our school has achieved these last 19 months, I see that every step of the way, I was informed and supported by the Harvard program.  Whether consulting lecture notes or readings, reaching out to my day school cohort, or checking in regularly with Jonathan and Alanna – all these elements contributed to the great success of my project, and allowed me to grow immeasurably as a leader.  Even in little things, I learned a lot – such as greeting students every morning by name, which is the way Harvard leaders greeted us and which made us feel so good every morning before a hard day of learning and work.  Above all, I made close colleagues and friends for life, as our day school group’s daily WhatsApp chat attests – we share ideas, professional and personal successes and frustrations, and always lend one another support.  The Harvard program is a gift that literally keeps on giving!

Yehuda Jeiger at Harvard

In everything I do as an Associate Principal – from running meetings to planning curriculum and even greeting students – I look back on my Harvard experience as the model par excellence for how to be an effective educational leader.  It was a real privilege to be in the program; a lot of who I am today in 2019 goes back to that week in Cambridge.  There really is nothing like it.